Synergistic pesticidal compositions and related methods

ABSTRACT

A pesticidal composition comprises a synergistically effective amount of a sulfoximine-based nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist compound and a pesticide selected from N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio) propanamide (I), N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl) sulfinyl) propanamide (II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof. A method of controlling pests comprises applying the pesticidal composition near a population of pests. A method of protecting a plant from infestation and attack by insects comprises contacting the plant with the synergistic pesticidal composition.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S.Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/894,045, filed Oct. 22, 2013,for “SYNERGISTIC PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS AND RELATED METHODS,” pending,the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein in its entirety bythis reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates to the field of compounds having pesticidalutility against pests in Phyla Nematoda, Arthropoda, and/or Mollusca,processes to produce such compounds and intermediates used in suchprocesses. These compounds may be used, for example, as nematicides,acaricides, miticides, and/or molluscicides.

BACKGROUND

Controlling pest populations is essential to human health, modernagriculture, food storage, and hygiene. There are more than ten thousandspecies of pests that cause losses in agriculture and the worldwideagricultural losses amount to billions of U.S. dollars each year.Accordingly, there exists a continuous need for new pesticides and formethods of producing and using such pesticides.

The Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC) has classifiedinsecticides into categories based on the best available evidence of themode of action of such insecticides. Insecticides in the IRAC Mode ofAction Group 4C are nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agoniststhat are sulfoximine-based compounds. The insecticides in this class arebelieved to mimic the agonist action of acetylcholine at nAChRs, causinghyperexcitation of the affected insects. Acetylcholine is the majorexcitatory neurotransmitter in the insect central nervous system.Example of insecticide in this class is sulfoxaflor(N-[methyloxido[1-[6-(trifluoromethyl)-3-pyridinyl]ethyl]-λ⁴-sulfanylidene]cyanamide).

Although the rotational application of pesticides having different modesof action may be adopted for good pest management practice, thisapproach does not necessarily give satisfactory insect control.Furthermore, even though combinations of pesticides have been studied, ahigh synergistic action has not always been found.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

As used herein, the term “synergistic effect” or grammatical variationsthereof means and includes a cooperative action encountered in acombination of two or more active compounds in which the combinedactivity of the two or more active compounds exceeds the sum of theactivity of each active compound alone.

The term “synergistically effective amount,” as used herein, means andincludes an amount of two or more active compounds that provides asynergistic effect defined above.

The term “pesticidally effective amount,” as used herein, means andincludes an amount of active pesticide that causes an adverse effect tothe at least one pest, wherein the adverse effect may include deviationsfrom natural development, killing, regulation, or the like.

The term “control” or grammatical variations thereof means and includesregulating the number of living pests or regulating the number of viableeggs of the pests or both.

The term “nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) agonist compound,” asused herein, means and includes any insecticides that are classified bythe Insecticide Resistance Action Committee (IRAC), based on the bestavailable evidence of the mode of action, to be within the IRAC Mode ofAction Group 4C.

In one particular embodiment, a pesticidal composition comprises asynergistically effective amount of a sulfoximine-based nAChR agonistcompound in combination with a pesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-(3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof.

It is appreciated that a pesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide (I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide (II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereofmay be oxidized to the corresponding sulfone in the presence of oxygen.

As shown in the examples, the existence of synergistic effect isdetermined using the method described in Colby S. R., “CalculatingSynergistic and Antagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations,”Weeds, 1967, 15, 20-22.

Surprisingly, it has been found that the pesticidal composition of thepresent disclosure has superior pest control at lower levels of thecombined concentrations of the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compoundand the pesticide selected from (I), (II), or any agriculturallyacceptable salt thereof employed than that which may be achieved whenthe sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound and the pesticide selectedfrom (I), (II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof areapplied alone. In other words, the synergistic pesticidal composition isnot a mere admixture of two active compounds resulting in theaggregation of the properties of the active compounds employed in thecomposition.

In some embodiments, the pesticidal compositions may comprise asynergistically effective amount of sulfoxaflor in combination with apesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof.

Table 1A shows weight ratios of the pesticide (I), (II), or anyagriculturally acceptable salt thereof to the sulfoximine-based nAChRagonist compound in the synergistic pesticidal compositions. In someembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be between about 20:1 and about 1:20. In someembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be between about 15:1 and about 1:15. In someembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be between about 10:1 and about 1:10. In someembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be between about 5:1 and about 1:5. In someembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be between about 4:1 and about 1:4. In someembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be between about 3:1 and about 1:3. In someembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be between about 2:1 and about 1:2. In someembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be about 1:1. Additionally, the weight ratiolimits of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compoundin the aforementioned embodiments may be interchangeable. By way ofnon-limiting example, the weight ratio of the pesticide to thesulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound may be between about 1:3 andabout 20:1.

TABLE 1A Range of the Weight Ratio of Pesticide I or II No. toSulfoximine-based nAChR Agonist Compound 1 20:1 to 1:20 2 15:1 to 1:15 310:1 to 1:10 4 5:1 to 1:5 5 4:1 to 1:4 6 3:1 to 1:3 7 2:1 to 1:2 8 1:1

Weight ratios of the pesticide (I), (II), or any agriculturallyacceptable salt thereof to the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compoundenvisioned to be synergistic pesticidal compositions may be depicted asX:Y; wherein X is the parts by weight of the pesticide (I), (II), or anyagriculturally acceptable salt thereof, and Y is the parts by weight ofthe sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound. The numerical range of theparts by weight for X is 0<X≦20 and the parts by weight for Y is 0<Y≦20as shown graphically in table 1B. By way of non-limiting example, theweight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonistcompound may be about 20:1.

TABLE 1B Sulfox- 20 X, Y X, Y imine- 15 X, Y X, Y X, Y based 10 X, Y X,Y nAChR 5 X, Y X, Y X, Y X, Y Agonist 4 X, Y X, Y X, Y X, Y Com- 3 X, YX, Y X, Y X, Y X, Y X, Y pound (Y) 2 X, Y X, Y X, Y X, Y Parts by 1 X, YX, Y X, Y X, Y X, Y X, Y X, Y X, Y weight 1 2 3 4 5 10 15 20 Pesticide(I or II) (X) Parts by weight

Ranges of weight ratios of the pesticide (I), (II), or anyagriculturally acceptable salt thereof to the sulfoximine-based nAChRagonist compound envisioned to be synergistic pesticidal compositionsmay be depicted as X₁:Y₁ to X₂:Y₂, wherein X and Y are defined as above.In one particular embodiment, the range of weight ratios may be X₁:Y₁ toX₂:Y₂, wherein X₁>Y₁ and X₂<Y₂. By way of non-limiting example, therange of weight ratios of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-based nAChRagonist compound may be between about 3:1 and about 1:3. In someembodiments, the range of weight ratios may be X₁:Y₁ to X₂:Y₂, whereinX₁>Y₁ and X₂>Y₂. By way of non-limiting example, the range of weightratios of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compoundmay be between about 15:1 and about 3:1. In further embodiments, therange of weight ratios may be X₁:Y₁ to X₂:Y₂, wherein X₁<Y₁ and X₂<Y₂.By way of non-limiting example, the range of weight ratios of thepesticide to the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound may be betweenabout 1:3 and about 1:20.

Table 1C shows weight ratios of the pesticide (I), (II), or anyagriculturally acceptable salt thereof to the sulfoximine-based nAChRagonist compound in the synergistic pesticidal compositions, accordingto particular embodiments of the present disclosure. In some particularembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be no more than about 513:1. In furtherembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be no more than about 256:1. In furtherembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be no more than about 128:1. In furtherembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be no more than about 64:1. In furtherembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be no more than about 32:1. In yet furtherembodiments, the weight ratio of the pesticide to the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound may be no more than about 2:1.

TABLE 1C Dose Rate Of Dose Rate of Weight Ratio of PesticideSulfoximine-based nAChR Pesticide (I or II) to (I or II) AgonistCompound Sulfoximine-based nAChR (weight %) (weight %) Agonist Compound0.04 0.000078 ≦513:1 0.04 0.000156 ≦256:1 0.04 0.0003125 ≦128:1 0.040.000625  ≦64:1 0.04 0.00125  ≦32:1 0.04 0.02  ≦2:1

The weight ratio of the pesticide (I), (II), or any agriculturallyacceptable salt thereof to the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compoundin the synergistic pesticidal composition may be varied and differentfrom those described in table 1A, table 1B, and table 1C. One skilled inthe art recognizes that the synergistic effective amount of thecombination of active compounds may vary accordingly to variousprevailing conditions. Non-limiting examples of such prevailingconditions may include the type of pests, the type of crops, the mode ofapplication, the application timing, the weather conditions, the soilconditions, the topographical character, or the like. It is understoodthat one skilled in the art may readily determine the synergisticeffective amount of the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound and thepesticide selected from (I), (II), or any agriculturally acceptable saltthereof accordingly to the prevailing conditions.

In some embodiments, the pesticidal compositions may comprise asynergistically effective amount of a sulfoximine-based nAChR agonistcompound in combination with a pesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II) or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof, and aphytologically-acceptable inert carrier (e.g., solid carrier, or liquidcarrier).

In other embodiments, the pesticidal composition may further comprise atleast one additive selected from a surfactant, a stabilizer, an emeticagent, a disintegrating agent, an antifoaming agent, a wetting agent, adispersing agent, a binding agent, dye, filler, or combinations thereof.

In particular embodiments, each of the pesticides (a sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound, and a pesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof) may be formulatedseparately as a wettable powder, emulsifiable concentrate, aqueous orliquid flowable, suspension concentrate or any one of the conventionalformulations used for pesticides, and then tank-mixed in the field withwater or other liquid for application as a liquid spray mixture. Whendesired, the separately formulated pesticides may also be appliedsequentially.

In some embodiments, the synergistic pesticidal composition may beformulated into a more concentrated primary composition, which is thendiluted with water or other diluent before use. In such embodiments, thesynergistic pesticidal composition may further comprise a surface activeagent.

In one particular embodiment, the method of protecting a plant frominfestation and attack by insects comprises contacting the plant with apesticidal composition comprising a synergistically effective amount ofa sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound in combination with apesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof.

In other embodiments, the method of protecting a plant from infestationand attack by insects comprises contacting the plant with a pesticidalcomposition comprising a synergistically effective amount of sulfoxaflorin combination with a pesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide (II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof.

In some embodiments, the pesticidal compositions may be in the form ofsolid. Non-limiting examples of the solid forms may include power, dustor granular formulations.

In other embodiments, the pesticidal compositions may be in the form ofliquid formulation. Examples of the liquid forms may include, but notlimited to, dispersion, suspension, emulsion or solution in appropriateliquid carrier. In particular embodiments, the synergistic pesticidalcompositions may be in the form of liquid dispersion, wherein thesynergistic pesticidal compositions may be dispersed in water or otheragriculturally suitable liquid carrier.

In certain embodiments, the synergistic pesticidal compositions may bein the form of solution in an appropriate organic solvent. In oneembodiment, the spray oils, which are widely used in agriculturalchemistry, may be used as the organic solvent for the synergisticpesticidal compositions.

In one particular embodiment, the method of controlling pests comprisesapplying a pesticidal composition near a population of pests, whereinthe pesticidal composition comprises a synergistically effective amountof a sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound in combination with apesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof.

In other embodiments, the method of controlling pests comprises applyinga pesticidal composition near a population of pests, wherein thepesticidal composition comprises a synergistically effective amount ofsulfoxaflor in combination with a pesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide, (II), or any agriculturally acceptable saltthereof

The control of pests may be achieved by applying a pesticidallyeffective amount of the synergistic pesticidal compositions in form ofsprays, topical treatment, gels, seed coatings, microcapsulations,systemic uptake, baits, eartags, boluses, foggers, fumigants aerosols,dusts, or the like.

These disclosed pesticidal compositions may be used, for example, asnematicides, acaricides, miticides, and/or molluscicides.

The pesticidal composition of the present disclosure may be used tocontrol a wide variety of insects. As a non-limiting example, in one ormore embodiments, the pesticidal composition may be used to control oneor more members of at least one of Phylum Arthropoda, Phylum Nematoda,Subphylum Chelicerata, Subphylum Myriapoda, Subphylum Hexapoda, ClassInsecta, Class Arachnida, and Class Symphyla. In at least someembodiments, the method of the present disclosure may be used to controlone or more members of at least one of Class Insecta and ClassArachnida.

As a non-limiting example, in one or more embodiments, the method of thepresent disclosure may be used to control one or more members of atleast one of Phylum Arthropoda, Phylum Nematoda, Subphylum Chelicerata,Subphylum Myriapoda, Subphylum Hexapoda, Class Insecta, Class Arachnida,and Class Symphyla. In at least some embodiments, the method of thepresent disclosure may be used to control one or more members of atleast one of Class Insecta and Class Arachnida.

In additional embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may beused to control members of the Order Coleoptera (beetles) including, butnot limited to, Acanthoscelides spp. (weevils), Acanthoscelides obtectus(common bean weevil), Agrilus planipennis (emerald ash borer), Agriotesspp. (wireworms), Anoplophora glabripennis (Asian longhorned beetle),Anthonomus spp. (weevils), Anthonomus grandis (boll weevil), Aphidiusspp., Apion spp. (weevils), Apogonia spp. (grubs), Ataenius spretulus(Black Turfgrass Ataenius), Atomaria linearis (pygmy mangold beetle),Aulacophore spp., Bothynoderes punctiventris (beet root weevil), Bruchusspp. (weevils), Bruchus pisorum (pea weevil), Cacoesia spp.,Callosobruchus maculatus (southern cow pea weevil), Carpophilushemipteras (dried fruit beetle), Cassida vittata, Cerosterna spp.,Cerotoma spp. (chrysomelids), Cerotoma trifurcata (bean leaf beetle),Ceutorhynchus spp. (weevils), Ceutorhynchus assimilis (cabbage seedpodweevil), Ceutorhynchus napi (cabbage curculio), Chaetocnema spp.(chrysomelids), Colaspis spp. (soil beetles), Conoderus scalaris,Conoderus stigmosus, Conotrachelus nenuphar (plum curculio), Cotinusnitidis (Green June beetle), Crioceris asparagi (asparagus beetle),Cryptolestes ferrugineus (rusty grain beetle), Cryptolestes pusillus(flat grain beetle), Cryptolestes turcicus (Turkish grain beetle),Ctenicera spp. (wireworms), Curculio spp. (weevils), Cyclocephala spp.(grubs), Cylindrocpturus adspersus (sunflower stem weevil), Deporausmarginatus (mango leaf-cutting weevil), Dermestes lardarius (larderbeetle), Dermestes maculates (hide beetle), Diabrotica spp.(chrysomelids), Epilachna varivestis (Mexican bean beetle), Faustinuscubae, Hylobius pales (pales weevil), Hypera spp. (weevils), Hyperapostica (alfalfa weevil), Hyperdoes spp. (Hyperodes weevil),Hypothenemus hampei (coffee berry beetle), Ips spp. (engravers),Lasioderma serricorne (cigarette beetle), Leptinotarsa decemlineata(Colorado potato beetle), Liogenys fuscus, Liogenys suturalis,Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus (rice water weevil), Lyctus spp. (woodbeetles/powder post beetles), Maecolaspis joliveti, Megascelis spp.,Melanotus communis, Meligethes spp., Meligethes aeneus (blossom beetle),Melolontha melolontha (common European cockchafer), Oberea brevis,Oberea linearis, Oryctes rhinoceros (date palm beetle), Oryzaephilusmercator (merchant grain beetle), Oryzaephilus suninamensis (sawtoothedgrain beetle), Otiorhynchus spp. (weevils), Oulema melanopus (cerealleaf beetle), Oulema oryzae, Pantomorus spp. (weevils), Phyllophaga spp.(May/June beetle), Phyllophaga cuyabana (chrysomelids), Phynchites spp.,Popillia japonica (Japanese beetle), Prostephanus truncates (largergrain borer), Rhizopertha dominica (lesser grain borer), Rhizotrogusspp. (European chafer), Rhynchophorus spp. (weevils), Scolytus spp.(wood beetles), Shenophorus spp. (Billbug), Sitona lineatus (pea leafweevil), Sitophilus spp. (grain weevils), Sitophilus granaries (granaryweevil), Sitophilus oryzae (rice weevil), Stegobium paniceum (drugstorebeetle), Tribolium spp. (flour beetles), Tribolium castaneum (red flourbeetle), Tribolium confusum (confused flour beetle), Trogodermavariabile (warehouse beetle), and Zabrus tenebioides.

In other embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may also beused to control members of the Order Dermaptera (earwigs).

In additional embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may beused to control members of the Order Dictyoptera (cockroaches)including, but is not limited to, Blattella germanica (Germancockroach), Blatta orientalis (oriental cockroach), Parcoblattapennylvanica, Periplaneta americana (American cockroach), Periplanetaaustraloasiae (Australian cockroach), Periplaneta brunnea (browncockroach), Periplaneta fuliginosa (smokybrown cockroach), Pyncoselussuninamensis (Surinam cockroach), and Supella longipalpa (brownbandedcockroach).

In further embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may be usedto control members of the Order Diptera (true flies) including, but isnot limited to, Aedes spp. (mosquitoes), Agromyza frontella (alfalfablotch leafminer), Agromyza spp. (leaf miner flies), Anastrepha spp.(fruit flies), Anastrepha suspensa (Caribbean fruit fly), Anopheles spp.(mosquitoes), Bactrocera spp. (fruit flies), Bactrocera cucurbitae(melon fly), Bactrocera dorsalis (oriental fruit fly), Ceratitis spp.(fruit flies), Ceratitis capitata (Mediterranean fruit fly), Chrysopsspp. (deer flies), Cochliomyia spp. (screwworms), Contarinia spp. (Gallmidges), Culex spp. (mosquitoes), Dasineura spp. (gall midges),Dasineura brassicae (cabbage gall midge), Delia spp., Delia platura(seedcorn maggot), Drosophila spp. (vinegar flies), Fannia spp. (filthflies), Fannia canicularis (little house fly), Fannia scalaris (latrinefly), Gasterophilus intestinalis (horse bot fly), Gracillia perseae,Haematobia irritans (horn fly), Hylemyia spp. (root maggots), Hypodermalineatum (common cattle grub), Liriomyza spp. (leafminer flies),Liriomyza brassica (serpentine leafminer), Liriomyza sativae (vegetableleafminer), Melophagus ovinus (sheep ked), Musca spp. (muscid flies),Musca autumnalis (face fly), Musca domestica (house fly), Oestrus ovis(sheep bot fly), Oscinella frit (frit fly), Pegomyia betae (beetleafminer), Phorbia spp., Psila rosae (carrot rust fly), Rhagoletiscerasi (cherry fruit fly), Rhagoletis pomonella (apple maggot),Sitodiplosis mosellana (orange wheat blossom midge), Stomoxys calcitrans(stable fly), Tabanus spp. (horse flies), and Tipula spp. (crane flies).

In other embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may be usedto control members of the Order Hemiptera Sub-order Heteroptera (truebugs) including, but is not limited to, Acrosternum hilare (green stinkbug), Blissus leucopterus (chinch bug), Bragada hilaris, Calocorisnorvegicus (potato mirid), Cimex hemipterus (tropical bed bug), Cimexlectularius (bed bug), Dagbertus fasciatus, Dichelops furcatus,Dysdercus suturellus (cotton stainer), Edessa meditabunda, Eurygastermaura (cereal bug), Euschistus heros, Euschistus servus (brown stinkbug), Helopeltis antonii, Helopeltis theivora (tea blight plantbug),Lagynotomus spp. (stink bugs), Leptocorisa oratorius, Leptocorisavaricornis, Lygus spp. (plant bugs), Lygus hesperus (western tarnishedplant bug), Lygus lineolaris (tarnished plant bug), Maconellicoccushirsutus, Neurocolpus longirostris, Nezara viridula (southern greenstink bug), Phytocoris spp. (plant bugs), Phytocoris californicus,Phytocoris relativus, Piezodorus guildinii (redbanded stink bug),Poecilocapsus lineatus (fourlined plant bug), Psallus vaccinicola,Pseudacysta perseae, Scaptocoris castanea, and Triatoma spp.(bloodsucking conenose bugs/kissing bugs).

In additional embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may beused to control members of the Order Hemiptera, Sub-ordersAuchenorrhyncha (Free-living Hemipterans) and Sternorrhyncha(Plant-parasitic Hemipterans) (aphids, scales, whiteflies, leaflhoppers)including, but is not limited to, Acrythosiphon pisum (pea aphid),Adelges spp. (adelgids), Aleurodes proletella (cabbage whitefly),Aleurodicus disperses, Aleurothrixus floccosus (woolly whitefly),Aluacaspis spp., Amrasca bigutella bigutella, Aphrophora spp.(leafhoppers), Aonidiella aurantii (California red scale), Aphis spp.(aphids), Aphis gossypii (cotton aphid), Aphis pomi (apple aphid),Aulacorthum solani (foxglove aphid), Bemisia spp. (whiteflies), Bemisiaargentifolii, Bemisia tabaci (sweetpotato whitefly), Brachycolus noxius(Russian aphid), Brachycorynella asparagi (asparagus aphid), Brevenniarehi, Brevicoryne brassicae (cabbage aphid), Ceroplastes spp. (scales),Ceroplastes rubens (red wax scale), Chionaspis spp. (scales),Chrysomphalus spp. (scales), Chrysomphalus aonidum (Florida red scale)Coccus spp. (scales), Coccus pseudomagnoliarum (citricola scale),Dysaphis plantaginea (rosy apple aphid), Empoasca spp. (leafhoppers),Eriosoma lanigerum (woolly apple aphid), Icerya purchasi (cottonycushion scale), Idioscopus nitidulus (mango leafhopper), Laodelphaxstriatellus (smaller brown planthopper), Lepidosaphes spp., Macrosiphumspp., Macrosiphum euphorbiae (potato aphid), Macrosiphum granarium(English grain aphid), Macrosiphum rosae (rose aphid), Macrostelesquadrilineatus (aster leafhopper), Mahanarva frimbiolata, Metopolophiumdirhodum (rose grain aphid), Mictis longicornis, Myzus spp., Myzuspersicae (green peach aphid), Nephotettix spp. (leafhoppers),Nephotettix cinctipes (green leafhopper), Nilaparvata lugens (brownplanthopper), Paratrioza cockerelli (tomato psyllid), Parlatoriapergandii (chaff scale), Parlatoria ziziphi (ebony scale), Peregrinusmaidis (corn delphacid), Philaenus spp. (spittlebugs), Phylloxeravitifoliae (grape phylloxera), Physokermes piceae (spruce bud scale),Planococcus spp. (mealybugs), Planococcus citri (citrus mealybug),Planococcus ficus (grape mealybug), Pseudococcus spp. (mealybugs),Pseudococcus brevipes (pine apple mealybug), Quadraspidiotus perniciosus(San Jose scale), Rhopalosiphum spp. (aphids), Rhopalosiphum maidis(corn leaf aphid), Rhopalosiphum padi (oat bird-cherry aphid), Saissetiaspp. (scales), Saissetia oleae (black scale), Schizaphis graminum(greenbug), Sitobion avenae (English grain aphid), Sogatella furcifera(white-backed planthopper), Therioaphis spp. (aphids), Toumeyella spp.(scales), Toxoptera spp. (aphids), Trialeurodes spp. (whiteflies),Trialeurodes vaporariorum (greenhouse whitefly), Trialeurodesabutiloneus (bandedwing whitefly), Unaspis spp. (scales), Unaspisyanonensis (arrowhead scale), and Zulia entreriana. In at least someembodiments, the method of the present disclosure may be used to controlMyzus persicae.

In other embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may be usedto control members of the Order Hymenoptera (ants, wasps, and sawflies)including, but not limited to, Acromyrrmex spp., Athalia rosae, Attaspp. (leafcutting ants), Camponotus spp. (carpenter ants), Diprion spp.(sawflies), Formica spp. (ants), Iridomyrmex humilis (Argentine ant),Monomorium spp., Monomorium minumum (little black ant), Monomoriumpharaonis (Pharaoh ant), Neodiprion spp. (sawflies), Pogonomyrmex spp.(harvester ants), Polistes spp. (paper wasps), Solenopsis spp. (fireants), Tapoinoma sessile (odorous house ant), Tetranomorium spp.(pavement ants), Vespula spp. (yellow jackets), and Xylocopa spp.(carpenter bees).

In certain embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may be usedto control members of the Order Isoptera (termites) including, but notlimited to, Coptotermes spp., Coptotermes curvignathus, Coptotermesfrenchii, Coptotermes formosanus (Formosan subterranean termite),Cornitermes spp. (nasute termites), Cryptotermes spp. (drywoodtermites), Heterotermes spp. (desert subterranean termites),Heterotermes aureus, Kalotermes spp. (drywood termites), Incistitermesspp. (drywood termites), Macrotermes spp. (fungus growing termites),Marginitermes spp. (drywood termites), Microcerotermes spp. (harvestertermites), Microtermes obesi, Procornitermes spp., Reticulitermes spp.(subterranean termites), Reticulitermes banyulensis, Reticulitermesgrassei, Reticulitermes flavipes (eastern subterranean termite),Reticulitermes hageni, Reticulitermes hesperus (western subterraneantermite), Reticulitermes santonensis, Reticulitermes speratus,Reticulitermes tibialis, Reticulitermes virginicus, Schedorhinotermesspp., and Zootermopsis spp. (rotten-wood termites).

In additional embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may beused to control members of the Order Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies)including, but not limited to, Achoea janata, Adoxophyes spp.,Adoxophyes orana, Agrotis spp. (cutworms), Agrotis ipsilon (blackcutworm), Alabama argillacea (cotton leafworm), Amorbia cuneana,Amyelosis transitella (navel orangeworm), Anacamptodes defectaria,Anarsia lineatella (peach twig borer), Anomis sabulifera (jute looper),Anticarsia gemmatalis (velvetbean caterpillar), Archips argyrospila(fruittree leafroller), Archips rosana (rose leaf roller), Argyrotaeniaspp. (tortricid moths), Argyrotaenia citrana (orange tortrix),Autographa gamma, Bonagota cranaodes, Borbo cinnara (rice leaf folder),Bucculatrix thurberiella (cotton leafperforator), Caloptilia spp. (leafminers), Capua reticulana, Carposina niponensis (peach fruit moth),Chilo spp., Chlumetia transversa (mango shoot borer), Choristoneurarosaceana (obliquebanded leafroller), Chrysodeixis spp., Cnaphalocerusmedinalis (grass leafroller), Colias spp., Conpomorpha cramerella,Cossus cossus (carpenter moth), Crambus spp. (Sod webworms),Cydiafunebrana (plum fruit moth), Cydia molesta (oriental fruit moth),Cydia nignicana (pea moth), Cydia pomonella (codling moth), Darnadiducta, Diaphania spp. (stem borers), Diatraea spp. (stalk borers),Diatraea saccharalis (sugarcane borer), Diatraea graniosella(southwester corn borer), Earias spp. (bollworms), Earias insulata(Egyptian bollworm), Earias vitella (rough northern bollworm),Ecdytopopha aurantianum, Elasmopalpus lignosellus (lesser cornstalkborer), Epiphysias postruttana (light brown apple moth), Ephestia spp.(flour moths), Ephestia cautella (almond moth), Ephestia elutella(tobbaco moth), Ephestia kuehniella (Mediterranean flour moth), Epimecesspp., Epinotia aporema, Erionota thrax (banana skipper), Eupoeciliaambiguella (grape berry moth), Euxoa auxiliaris (army cutworm), Feltiaspp. (cutworms), Gortyna spp. (stemborers), Grapholita molesta (orientalfruit moth), Hedylepta indicata (bean leaf webber), Helicoverpa spp.(noctuid moths), Helicoverpa armigera (cotton bollworm), Helicoverpa zea(bollworm/corn earworm), Heliothis spp. (noctuid moths), Heliothisvirescens (tobacco budworm), Hellula undalis (cabbage webworm),Indarbela spp. (root borers), Keiferia lycopersicella (tomato pinworm),Leucinodes orbonalis (eggplant fruit borer), Leucoptera malifoliella,Lithocollectis spp., Lobesia botrana (grape fruit moth), Loxagrotis spp.(noctuid moths), Loxagrotis albicosta (western bean cutworm), Lymantriadispar (gypsy moth), Lyonetia clerkella (apple leaf miner), Mahasenacorbetti (oil palm bagworm), Malacosoma spp. (tent caterpillars),Mamestra brassicae (cabbage armyworm), Maruca testulalis (bean podborer), Metisa plana (bagworm), Mythimna unipuncta (true armyworm),Neoleucinodes elegantalis (small tomato borer), Nymphula depunctalis(rice caseworm), Operophthera brumata (winter moth), Ostrinia nubilalis(European corn borer), Oxydia vesulia, Pandemis cerasana (common curranttortrix), Pandemis heparana (brown apple tortrix), Papilio demodocus,Pectinophora gossypiella (pink bollworm), Peridroma spp. (cutworms),Peridroma saucia (variegated cutworm), Perileucoptera coffeella (whitecoffee leafminer), Phthorimaea operculella (potato tuber moth),Phyllocnisitis citrella, Phyllonorycter spp. (leafminers), Pieris rapae(imported cabbageworm), Plathypena scabra, Plodia interpunctella (Indianmeal moth), Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth), Polychrosis viteana(grape berry moth), Prays endocarps, Prays oleae (olive moth),Pseudaletia spp. (noctuid moths), Pseudaletia unipunctata (armyworm),Pseudoplusia includens (soybean looper), Rachiplusia nu, Scirpophagaincertulas, Sesamia spp. (stemborers), Sesamia inferens (pink rice stemborer), Sesamia nonagrioides, Setora nitens, Sitotroga cerealella(Angoumois grain moth), Sparganothis pilleriana, Spodoptera spp.(armyworms), Spodoptera exigua (beet armyworm), Spodoptera fugiperda(fall armyworm), Spodoptera oridania (southern armyworm), Synanthedonspp. (root borers), Thecla basilides, Thermisia gemmatalis, Tineolabisselliella (webbing clothes moth), Trichoplusia ni (cabbage looper),Tuta absoluta, Yponomeuta spp., Zeuzera coffeae (red branch borer), andZeuzera pyrina (leopard moth). In at least some embodiments, the methodof the present disclosure may be used to control Spodoptera exigua.

The method of the present disclosure may be used to also control membersof the Order Mallophaga (chewing lice) including, but not limited to,Bovicola ovis (sheep biting louse), Menacanthus stramineus (chicken bodylouse), and Menopon gallinea (common hen louse).

In additional embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may beused to control members of the Order Orthoptera (grasshoppers, locusts,and crickets) including, but not limited to, Anabrus simplex (Mormoncricket), Gryllotalpidae (mole crickets), Locusta migratoria, Melanoplusspp. (grasshoppers), Microcentrum retinerve (angularwinged katydid),Pterophylla spp. (kaydids), chistocerca gregaria, Scudderia furcata(forktailed bush katydid), and Valanga nigricorni.

In other embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may be usedto control members of the Order Phthiraptera (sucking lice) including,but not limited to, Haematopinus spp. (cattle and hog lice), Linognathusovillus (sheep louse), Pediculus humanus capitis (human body louse),Pediculus humanus humanus (human body lice), and Pthirus pubis (crablouse).

In particular embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may beused to control members of the Order Siphonaptera (fleas) including, butnot limited to, Ctenocephalides canis (dog flea), Ctenocephalides felis(cat flea), and Pulex irritans (human flea).

In additional embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may beused to control members of the Order Thysanoptera (thrips) including,but not limited to, Caliothrips fasciatus (bean thrips), Caliothripsphaseoli, Frankliniella fusca (tobacco thrips), Frankliniellaoccidentalis (western flower thrips), Frankliniella shultzei,Frankliniella williamsi (corn thrips), Heliothfips haemorrhaidalis(greenhouse thrips), Riphiphorothrips cruentatus, Scirtothrips spp.,Scirtothrips citri (citrus thrips), Scirtothrips dorsalis (yellow teathrips), Taeniothrips rhopalantennalis, Thrips spp., Thrips tabaci(onion thrips), and Thrips hawaiiensis (Hawaiian flower thrips).

The method of the present disclosure may be used to also control membersof the Order Thysanura (bristletails) including, but not limited to,Lepisma spp. (silverfish) and Thermobia spp. (firebrats).

In further embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may be usedto control members of the Order Acari (mites and ticks) including, butnot limited to, Acarapsis woodi (tracheal mite of honeybees), Acarusspp. (food mites), Acarus siro (grain mite), Aceria mangiferae (mangobud mite), Aculops spp., Aculops lycopersici (tomato russet mite),Aculops pelekasi, Aculus pelekassi, Aculus schlechtendali (apple rustmite), Amblyomma americanum (lone star tick), Boophilus spp. (ticks),Brevipalpus obovatus (privet mite), Brevipalpus phoenicis (red and blackflat mite), Demodex spp. (mange mites), Dermacentor spp. (hard ticks),Dermacentor variabilis (american dog tick), Dermatophagoidespteronyssinus (house dust mite), Eotetranycus spp., Eotetranychuscarpini (yellow spider mite), Epitimerus spp., Eriophyes spp., Ixodesspp. (ticks), Metatetranycus spp., Notoedres cati, Oligonychus spp.,Oligonychus coffee, Oligonychus ilicus (southern red mite), Panonychusspp., Panonychus citri (citrus red mite), Panonychus ulmi (European redmite), Phyllocoptruta oleivora (citrus rust mite), Polyphagotarsonemunlatus (broad mite), Rhipicephalus sanguineus (brown dog tick),Rhizoglyphus spp. (bulb mites), Sarcoptes scabiei (itch mite),Tegolophus perseaflorae, Tetranychus spp., Tetranychus urticae(twospotted spider mite), and Varroa destructor (honey bee mite).

In additional embodiments, the method of the present disclosure may beused to control members of the Order Nematoda (nematodes) including, butnot limited to, Aphelenchoides spp. (foliar nematodes), Belonolaimusspp. (sting nematodes), Criconemella spp. (ring nematodes), Dirofilariaimmitis (dog heartworm), Ditylenchus spp. (stem and bulb nematodes),Heterodera spp. (cyst nematodes), Heterodera zeae (corn cyst nematode),Hirschmanniella spp. (root nematodes), Hoplolaimus spp. (lancenematodes), Meloidogyne spp. (root knot nematodes), Meloidogyneincognita (root knot nematode), Onchocerca volvulus (hook-tail worm),Pratylenchus spp. (lesion nematodes), Radopholus spp. (burrowingnematodes), and Rotylenchus reniformis (kidney-shaped nematode).

In at least some embodiments, the method of the present disclosure maybe used to control at least one insect in one or more of the OrdersLepidoptera, Coleoptera, Hemiptera, Thysanoptera, Isoptera, Orthoptera,Diptera, Hymenoptera, and Siphonaptera, and at least one mite in theOrder Acari.

In some embodiments, the method of controlling an insect may compriseapplying a pesticidal composition near a population of insects, whereinthe pesticidal composition comprises a synergistically effective amountof a sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound in combination with apesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof, and wherein theinsects are sap feeding bugs such as brown stink bug, Euschistus servus(Say).

In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the pesticidal compositionmay be used in conjunction (such as, in a compositional mixture, or asimultaneous or sequential application) with one or more compoundshaving acaricidal, algicidal, avicidal, bactericidal, fungicidal,herbicidal, insecticidal, molluscicidal, nematicidal, rodenticidal,and/or virucidal properties.

In one embodiment of the present disclosure, the pesticidal compositionmay be used in conjunction (such as, in a compositional mixture, or asimultaneous or sequential application) with one or more compounds thatare antifeedants, bird repellents, chemosterilants, herbicide safeners,insect attractants, insect repellents, mammal repellents, matingdisrupters, plant activators, plant growth regulators, and/orsynergists.

The pesticidal compositions of the present disclosure show a synergisticeffect, providing superior pest control at lower pesticidally effectiveamounts of the combined active compounds than when a sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound or a pesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide (I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl) propanamide (II), or any agriculturally acceptable saltthereof is used alone.

The pesticidal compositions of the present disclosure may have highsynergistic pest control and allow for a lower effective dosage rate, anincreased environmental safety, and a reduced incidence of pestresistance.

The following examples serve to explain embodiments of the presentinvention in more detail. These examples should not be construed asbeing exhaustive or exclusive as to the scope of this disclosure.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Preparation of3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanoyl chloride

A dry five-liter round bottom flask equipped with magnetic stirrer,nitrogen inlet, reflux condenser, and thermometer, was charged with3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanoic acid (prepared as described inthe PCT Publication No. WO 2013/062981 to Niyaz et al.) (188 g, 883mmol) in dichloromethane (CH₂Cl₂) (3 L). Thionyl chloride (525 g, 321mL, 4.42 mol) was added dropwise over 50 minutes. The reaction mixturewas heated to reflux (about 36° C.) for two hours, then cooled to roomtemperature (about 22° C.). The resulting mixture was concentrated undervacuum on a rotary evaporator, followed by distillation (40 Torr,product collected at a temperature of from about 123° C. to about 127°C.) to provide the title compound as a clear colorless liquid (177.3 g,86%): ¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 3.20 (t, J=7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.86 (t, J=7.1Hz, 2H), 2.78-2.67 (m, 2H), 2.48-2.31 (m, 2H); ¹⁹F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl₃)δ −66.42, −66.43, −66.44, −66.44.

Example 2 Preparation ofN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I)

To a solution of 3-chloro-N-ethyl-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-amine(prepared as described in the U.S. Publication No. 2012/0110702 to Yapet al.) (10 g, 44.9 mmol) in CH₂Cl₂ (100 mL) at a temperature of about0° C. and under N₂ was added pyridine (5.45 mL, 67.4 mmol),4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) (2.74 g, 22.45 mmol), and3-(((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio) propanoyl chloride (9.91 g, 44.9 mmol),sequentially. The reaction was warmed to room temperature and stirredfor one hour. The reaction mixture was poured into water (100 mL), andthe resulting mixture was stirred for five minutes. The mixture wastransferred to a separatory funnel, and the layers were separated. Theaqueous phase was extracted with CH₂Cl₂ (3×50 mL), and the combinedorganic extracts were dried over sodium sulfate (Na₂SO₄), filtered, andconcentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified via normal phaseflash chromatography (0% to 100% EtOAc/CH₂Cl₂) to provide the desiredproduct as a pale yellow solid (17.21 g, 89%): IR (thin film) 1659 cm⁻¹;¹H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 8.95 (d, J=2.6 Hz, 1H), 8.63 (dd, J=4.7, 1.3Hz, 1H), 8.05 (ddd, J=8.3, 2.7, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.96 (s, 1H), 7.47 (dd,J=8.3, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 3.72 (q, J=7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.84 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.66(m, 2H), 237 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 2H), 2.44 (m, 2H), 1.17 (t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H);ESIMS m/z 409 ([M+2H]⁺).

Example 3 Preparation ofN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II)

To a solution ofN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I) (500 mg, 1.229 mmol) in hexafluoroisopropanol (5 mL) stirring atroom temperature was added 30% hydrogen peroxide (523 mg, 4.92 mmol).The solution was stirred at room temperature for 15 minutes. It wasquenched with saturated sodium sulfite solution and extracted withCH₂Cl₂. Silica gel chromatography (0%-10% MeOH/CH₂Cl₂) gave the titlecompound as white semi-solid (495 mg, 95%): IR (thin film) 1660 cm⁻¹; ¹HNMR (400 MHz, CDCl₃) δ 8.96 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H), 8.64 (dd, J=4.7, 1.4 Hz,1H), 8.07-8.00 (m, 2H), 7.46 (ddd, J=8.3, 4.8, 0.7 Hz, 1H), 3.85-3.61(m, 2H), 3.23-3.08 (m, 1H), 3.03-2.76 (m, 3H), 2.74-2.52 (m, 4H), 1.18(t, J=7.2 Hz, 3H); ESIMS m/z 423 ([M+H]⁺).

Example 4 Determination of the Existence of Synergic Effect

The method described in Colby S. R., “Calculating Synergistic andAntagonistic Responses of Herbicide Combinations,” Weeds, 1967, 15,20-22 was used to determine an existence of synergic effect between thesulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound and the pesticide (I), (II) orany agriculturally acceptable salt thereof in the formulated pesticidalcomposition. In this method, the percent insect control of theformulated pesticidal composition as observed in the study was comparedto the “expected” percent control (E) as calculated by equation (1)(hereinafter “Colby's equation”) below:

$\begin{matrix}{E = {X + Y - \left( \frac{X\; Y}{100} \right)}} & (1)\end{matrix}$

where

X is the percentage of control with the first pesticide at a given rate(p),

Y is the percentage of control with the second pesticide at a given rate(q), and

E is the expected control by the first and second pesticide at a rate ofp+q.

If the observed percent control of the formulated pesticidal is greaterthan E, there is a synergistic effect between the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound and the pesticide (I), (II) or any agriculturallyacceptable salt thereof in the formulated pesticidal composition. If theobserved percent control of the formulated pesticidal is equaled to orless than E, there is no synergistic effect between thesulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound and the pesticide (I), (II) orany agriculturally acceptable salt thereof in the formulated pesticidalcomposition.

Example 5 Synergistic Effect ofN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II) and Sulfoxaflor Against Brown Stink Bug, Euschistus heros Example5A

A pesticidal composition was prepared by thoroughly mixing about 0.04weight % ofN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)ulfinyl)propanamide (hereinafter “compound II”) with about 0.000156 weight % ofsulfoxaflor.

The bioassays were performed wherein different active compounds wereapplied to the diet of five second-instar nymphs of brown stink bug,Euschistus heros. The percent control determined six days after diettreatment were as shown in table 2. The percent control of thepesticidal composition against brown stink bug, Euschistus heros, wasdetermined as the “Observed” action, and compared to those obtained byusing about 0.04 weight % of Compound II, and using about 0.000156weight % of sulfoxaflor alone. The “Colby's Expected Action” wascalculated using Colby's equation as discussed previously.

TABLE 2 % Control Six Treatment for Dose Rate Days After Brown Stink Bug(weight %) Treatment Compound II 0.04  0% Sulfoxaflor 0.000156 20%Compound II (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000156 100%  Observed ActionCompound II (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000156 20% Colby's Expected ActionCompound II (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000156 80% Differences: Observedvs. Expected

As shown in table 2, the observed percent control of the pesticidalcomposition against brown stink bug (100%) was five times higher thanthe expected percentage control according to Colby's equation (20%).This was 400% improvement over the Colby's expected action. It wassurprising and unexpected that not only there was synergistic effectbetween compound II and sulfoxaflor in the disclosed composition againstbrown stink bug, but also the large magnitude of such synergisticeffect.

Example 5B

A pesticidal composition was prepared by thoroughly mixing about 0.04weight % of compound II with about 0.000078 weight % of sulfoxaflor.

The bioassays were performed wherein different active compounds wereapplied to the diet of five second-instar nymphs of brown stink bug,Euschistus heros. The percent control determined six days after diettreatment were as shown in table 3.

TABLE 3 % Control Six Treatment for Dose Rate Days After Brown Stink Bug(weight %) Treatment Compound II 0.04 0% Sulfoxaflor 0.000078 0%Compound II (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000078 100%  Observed ActionCompound II (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000078 0% Colby's Expected ActionCompound II (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000078 100%  Differences: Observedvs. Expected

As shown in table 3, the observed percent control of the pesticidalcomposition against brown stink bug was 100% six days after diettreatment. On the other hand, compound II and sulfoxaflor, when usedalone, showed no control against brown stink bug, and therefore theexpected percentage control according to Colby's equation was zero.Thus, the pesticidal composition comprising 0.04 weight % of compound IIand 0.000078 weight % of sulfoxaflor showed synergistic effect againstbrown stink bug.

Example 6 Synergistic Effect ofN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I) and Sulfoxaflor Against Brown Stink Bug, Euschistus heros

A pesticidal composition was prepared by thoroughly mixing about 0.04weight % ofN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(hereinafter “compound I”) with about 0.000625 weight % of sulfoxaflor.

The active compounds were formulated in a 10% acetone solution with0.025% non-ionic surfactant, TWEEN® 20. Bioassays were performed foreach different active solution. Bean pieces (about one inch-long) wereused for the tests. Four bean pieces were placed in each tested activesolution and left there for 10 minutes. Bean pieces were taken out ofthe active solution, and each piece was placed in a well in a 32-welltray and allowed to air dry. Three third-instar nymphs of South Americanbrown stink bug, Euschistus heros, were infested into each well. Thepercent control determined after four days of the treatment were asshown in table 4.

TABLE 4 % Control Four Treatment for Dose Rate Days After Brown StinkBug, Euschistus heros (weight %) Treatment Compound I 0.04 0%Sulfoxaflor 0.000625 8% Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000625 25% Observed Action Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000625 8% Colby'sExpected Action Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000625 17% Differences: Observed vs. Expected

As shown in table 4, the observed percent control of the pesticidalcomposition against brown stink bug (25%) was higher than the expectedpercentage control according to Colby's equation (8%). This was about212.5% improvement over the Colby's expected action. Therefore, thepesticidal composition comprising 0.04 weight % of compound I and about0.000625 weight % of sulfoxaflor showed significant synergistic effectagainst South American brown stink bug, Euschistus heros.

Example 7 Synergistic Effect ofN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I) and Sulfoxaflor Against Western flower thrips, Frankliniellaoccidentalis Example 7A

A pesticidal composition was prepared by thoroughly mixing about 0.04weight % ofN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide (hereinafter “compound I”) with about 0.000078 weight % ofsulfoxaflor.

The active compounds were formulated in a 10% acetone solution with0.025% non-ionic surfactant, TWEEN® 20. Cotton leaf punches were usedfor bioassays. Two cotton leaf punches were placed in each solution andleft there for 10 minutes. Leaves were taken out of the solution, placedon a piece of filter paper in separated Petri dishes, and air dried.Each leaf disc was considered a repetition. Five larval stage 2 nymphsof Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, were infested perrepetition. The percent controls determined three days after thetreatment were as shown in table 5.

TABLE 5 % Control Three Treatment for Dose Rate Days After WesternFlower Thrips (weight %) Treatment Compound I 0.04  0% Sulfoxaflor0.000078 10% Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000078 20% ObservedAction Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000078 10% Colby's ExpectedAction Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.000078 10% Differences:Observed vs. Expected

As shown in table 5, the observed percent control of the pesticidalcomposition against Western flower thrips (20%) was higher than theexpected percentage control according to Colby's equation (10%). Thiswas 100% improvement over the Colby's expected action. Therefore, thepesticidal composition comprising 0.04 weight % of compound I and about0.000078 weight % of sulfoxaflor showed significant synergistic effectagainst Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis.

Example 7B

A pesticidal composition was prepared by thoroughly mixing about 0.04weight % of compound I with about 0.0003125 weight % of sulfoxaflor.

The active compounds formulated in a 10% acetone solution with 0.025%non-ionic surfactant, TWEEN® 20 were tested against Western flowerthrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, using the procedure described inexample 7A. The percent controls determined after three days of thetreatment were as shown in table 6.

TABLE 6 % Control Three Treatment for Dose Rate Days After WesternFlower Thrips (weight %) Treatment Compound I 0.04  0% Sulfoxaflor0.0003125 10% Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.0003125 30% ObservedAction Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.0003125 10% Colby's ExpectedAction Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.0003125 20% Differences:Observed vs. Expected

As shown in table 6, the observed percent control of the pesticidalcomposition against Western flower thrips (30%) was higher than theexpected percentage control according to Colby's equation (10%). Thiswas 200% improvement over the Colby's expected action. Therefore, thepesticidal composition comprising 0.04 weight % of compound I and about0.0003125 weight % of sulfoxaflor showed significant synergistic effectagainst Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis.

Example 7C

A pesticidal composition was prepared by thoroughly mixing about 0.04weight % of compound I with about 0.00125 weight % of sulfoxaflor.

The active compounds formulated in a 10% acetone solution with 0.025%non-ionic surfactant, TWEEN® 20 were tested against Western flowerthrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, using the procedure described inexample 7A. The percent controls determined three days after thetreatment were as shown in table 7.

TABLE 7 % Control Three Treatment for Dose Rate Days After WesternFlower Thrips (weight %) Treatment Compound I 0.04  0% Sulfoxaflor0.00125 10% Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.00125 20% ObservedAction Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.00125 10% Colby's ExpectedAction Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.00125 10% Differences:Observed vs. Expected

As shown in table 7, the observed percent control of the pesticidalcomposition against Western flower thrips (20%) was higher than theexpected percentage control according to Colby's equation (10%). Thiswas 100% improvement over the Colby's expected action. Therefore, thepesticidal composition comprising 0.04 weight % of compound I and about0.00125 weight % of sulfoxaflor showed significant synergistic effectagainst Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis.

Example 7D

A pesticidal composition was prepared by thoroughly mixing about 0.04weight % of compound I with about 0.02 weight % of sulfoxaflor.

The active compounds formulated in a 10% acetone solution with 0.025%non-ionic surfactant, TWEEN® 20 were tested against Western flowerthrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, using the procedure described inexample 7A. The percent controls determined after three days of thetreatment were as shown in table 8.

TABLE 8 % Control After Treatment for Dose Rate Three Days of WesternFlower Thrips (weight %) Treatment Compound I 0.04  0% Sulfoxaflor 0.0280% Compound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.02 100%  Observed ActionCompound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.02 80% Colby's Expected ActionCompound I (+) Sulfoxaflor 0.04 + 0.02 20% Differences: Observed vs.Expected

As shown in table 8, the observed percent control of the pesticidalcomposition against Western flower thrips (100%) was higher than theexpected percentage control according to Colby's equation (80%). Thiswas 25% improvement over the Colby's expected action. Therefore, thepesticidal composition comprising 0.04 weight % of compound I and about0.02 weight % of sulfoxaflor showed significant synergistic effectagainst Western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis.

Example 8 Synergistic Effect ofN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I) orN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II) and Sulfoxaflor

A pesticidal composition may be prepared by thoroughly mixing compound I(weight %) or compound II (weight %) with sulfoxaflor (weight %).

The bioassays may be performed for different active compounds againstbrown stink bug, Euschistus heros, using the same procedure as thatdescribed in example 5A. The percent control may be determined some timeafter the treatment.

The bioassays may be performed for different active compounds againstWestern flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis, using the sameprocedure as that described for example 7. The percent control may bedetermined some time after the treatment.

The observed percent control of the pesticidal composition against brownstink bug is expected to be higher than the expected percentage controlaccording to Colby's equation. Therefore, the pesticidal compositioncomprising compound I (weight %) or compound II (weight %) andsulfoxaflor (weight %) is expected to show synergistic effect againstbrown stink bug.

The observed percent control of the pesticidal composition againstWestern flower thrips is expected to be higher than the expectedpercentage control according to Colby's equation. Therefore, thepesticidal composition comprising compound I (weight %) or compound II(weight %) and sulfoxaflor (weight %) is expected to show synergisticeffect against Western flower thrips.

While the present disclosure may be susceptible to various modificationsand alternative forms, specific embodiments have been described by wayof example in detail herein. However, it should be understood that thepresent disclosure is not intended to be limited to the particular formsdisclosed. Rather, the present disclosure is to cover all modifications,equivalents, and alternatives falling within the scope of the presentdisclosure as defined by the following appended claims and their legalequivalents.

We claim:
 1. A pesticidal composition comprising a synergisticallyeffective amount of: a sulfoximine-based nicotinic acetylcholinereceptor (nAChR) agonist compound; and a pesticide selected fromN-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)thio)propanamide(I),N-(3-chloro-1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-N-ethyl-3-((3,3,3-trifluoropropyl)sulfinyl)propanamide(II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof.


2. The composition of claim 1, wherein the sulfoximine-based nAChRagonist compound comprises sulfoxaflor.
 3. The composition of claim 1,further comprising a phytologically-acceptable inert carrier.
 4. Thecomposition of claim 1, further comprising an additive selected from asurfactant, a stabilizer, an emetic agent, a disintegrating agent, anantifoaming agent, a wetting agent, a dispersing agent, a binding agent,dye, filler, or combinations thereof.
 5. The composition of claim 1,further comprising one or more compounds having acaricidal, algicidal,avicidal, bactericidal, fungicidal, herbicidal, insecticidal,molluscicidal, nematicidal, rodenticidal, virucidal or combinationsthereof properties.
 6. The composition of claim 1, further comprisingone or more compounds that are antifeedants, bird repellents,chemosterilants, herbicide safeners, insect attractants, insectrepellents, mammal repellents, mating disrupters, plant activators,plant growth regulators, synergists, or combinations thereof.
 7. Thecomposition of claim 1, wherein a weight ratio of the pesticide selectedfrom (I), (II) or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof to thesulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound is no more than about 513:1 8.The composition of claim 1, wherein a weight ratio of the pesticideselected from (I), (II) or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof tothe sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound is no more than about256:1.
 9. The composition of claim 1, wherein a weight ratio of thepesticide selected from (I), (II) or any agriculturally acceptable saltthereof to the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound is no more thanabout 128:1.
 10. The composition of claim 1, wherein a weight ratio ofthe pesticide selected from (I), (II) or any agriculturally acceptablesalt thereof to the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound is no morethan about 64:1.
 11. The composition of claim 1, wherein a weight ratioof the pesticide selected from (I), (II) or any agriculturallyacceptable salt thereof to the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compoundis no more than about 32:1.
 12. The composition of claim 1, wherein aweight ratio of the pesticide selected from (I), (II) or anyagriculturally acceptable salt thereof to the sulfoximine-based nAChRagonist compound is no more than about 2:1.
 13. The composition of claim1, wherein the weight ratio of the pesticide (I), (II), or anyagriculturally acceptable salt thereof and the sulfoximine-based nAChRagonist compound is X:Y; wherein X is the parts by weight of thepesticide (I), (II), or any agriculturally acceptable salt thereof, andthe numerical range is 0<X≦20; Y is the parts by weight of thesulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound, and the numerical range is0<Y≦20.
 14. The composition of claim 13, wherein the ranges of weightratios of the pesticide (I), (II), or any agriculturally acceptable saltthereof and the sulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound are X₁:Y₁ toX₂:Y₂, wherein one of the following conditions is satisfied: (a) X₁>Y₁and X₂<Y₂; or (b) X₁>Y₁ and X₂>Y₂; or (c) X₁<Y₁ and X₂<Y₂.
 15. A methodof controlling pests comprising applying the pesticidal composition ofclaim 1, near a population of pests, in an amount sufficient to controlthe pests.
 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the sulfoximine-basednAChR agonist compound comprises sulfoxaflor.
 17. The method of claim15, wherein the pests comprise sap feeding insects.
 18. The method ofclaim 15, wherein the pests are brown stink bug, Euschistus heros.
 19. Amethod for protecting a plant from infestation and attack by insects,the method comprising contacting the plant with the pesticidalcomposition of claim
 1. 20. The method of claim 19, wherein thesulfoximine-based nAChR agonist compound comprises sulfoxaflor.